Counties across state cut services

Text Size: A | A | A

Print this Article Email this Article

Timber counties in Oregon are cutting services and considering tax increases to deal with the loss of a federal timber payments safety net, according to a survey by Oregon State University's Rural Studies Program released Wednesday.

The survey found the biggest cuts are to road and bridge maintenance, emergency services and sheriff's departments.

Eastern Oregon felt it most in road budgets. Western Oregon cut deepest in administration, finance, parks, emergency services and sheriff's departments. The six rural counties in southwestern Oregon lost an average of one-third of their general funds.

In Jackson County, the loss of $23 million in annual payments led to the closure of all 15 libraries last year. They were reopened in October after library management was outsourced to a private company.

Most people will not immediately feel the impacts for several years, particularly the deterioration of roads, said Bruce Weber, an OSU economist who worked on the survey.

"I think it will take something dramatic for people to realize what not having a sheriff's department or emergency services will mean," he said.

Jackson County officials, who recently wrapped up a $290 million annual budget for this fiscal year, say they are in better shape than many counties because they took cost-saving steps before the loss of the federal money.

The county has the equivalent of 909 full-time employees, down from 1,089 in 2004.

Commissioner C.W. Smith said by making cuts early and privatizing many services, Jackson County was able to survive the loss of $23 million annually. But Smith added that commissioners still don't know how they are going to get money to fully maintain roads.

Overall, 23 counties face road budget shortfalls, 16 can't maintain buildings, eight in Eastern Oregon can't maintain bridges, and eight in Western Oregon can't maintain parks.

Thirty-three of Oregon's 36 counties receive payments from the federal government tied to timber harvests on national forests.

When logging on federal land was cut more than 80 percent in 1994 to protect habitat for the spotted owl and salmon, Congress voted in a safety net. Payments worth about $200 million a year in Oregon were ramped down and expired last month.

While the economies of many rural areas of Oregon no longer depend on timber, many county governments still do. With high levels of federal timber payments, they never created a permanent tax base they could depend on. Now that they must raise taxes to maintain services, they are hamstrung by constitutional constraints that make it difficult.

The survey found about half of the counties are considering raising taxes or fees to cover the shortfall, but Weber said their chances of succeeding are only about one in three.

A special governor's task force has said Oregon's best hope is for Congress to restore the safety net for four more years to give the state and counties time to work out alternative sources of revenue, such as a controversial plan to boost logging in Western Oregon.

So far efforts by Oregon's congressional delegation have failed.

Meanwhile, the task force suggested counties look at raising taxes.

The survey found that in 2005-'06, one-fourth of the counties had cut services and jobs, and one-third had increased fees. Half said they could still maintain their roads.

By 2007-'08, two-thirds of counties had cut services and jobs, and only one-fourth could still pay for roads.

Ten counties spent all of their final safety net payment, while 13 counties set aside an average of 54 percent for the future. Four counties put three-quarters of the payments into reserves.

Over the past three years, timber counties have cut full-time jobs by 2 percent.

On the net: http://ruralstudies.oregonstate.edu/Publications/SRS—Report.pdf

Mail Tribune reporter Damian Mann contributed to this story.

Reader Reaction We welcome your feedback on this story, or any follow-up story ideas you might have. Please send a letter to the editor to letters@mailtribune.com, or submit story ideas online here. When submitting a letter to the editor, please review our submissions policy.

Print this Article Email this Article